The Genetic Relationship between Bugis and Kaili

Article Sidebar

PDF
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Journal Educational Verkenning
Published: Jun 7, 2022
Keywords:
Reviews Genetic Relationship,
Lexicostatistic,
Glottochronology,
Sound Correspondence

Main Article Content

Makkawaru Makkawaru
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Hendrokumoro Hendrokumoro
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

This writing aimed to explore Bugis and Kaili’s language trace of kinship using a Comparative Linguistics point of view or what is commonly called Comparative Historical Linguistics. In particular, this study aimed to find out how far the footprint of Bugis and Kaili language and when both languages separate from its proto-language. The data were analyzed by implementing lexicostatistics and glottochronology techniques to identify quantitative evidence, and sound correspondence was applied to identify qualitative evidences. The results reveal that in lexicostatistics the cognate percentage of both languages is 27% and by glottochronology calculation of both languages split from their proto-language between 660 – 918 CE (2020). Qualitatively, there are six sets of sound correspondences found in BB and BK are: / ǝ - a /, / a - ǝ /, / o - u /, / m - n /, / b - v /, and /? - Ø /, and six types of sound changes found, are: Lenition and fortition, sound loss, apocope, syncope, sound addition, and metathesis.

Article Details

How to Cite
Makkawaru, M., & Hendrokumoro, H. (2022). The Genetic Relationship between Bugis and Kaili. Journal Educational Verkenning, 3(1), 17-27. Retrieved from https://hdpublication.com/index.php/jev/article/view/143
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Crowley, T., & Bowern, C. (2010). An Introduction to Historical Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Darmawati, M. R. (2016). Jejak Bahasa Toraja Dalam Bahasa Kaili: Segugus Rekam Jejak Bahasa Austronesia Di Nusantara (Kaili Language in Torajanese Language: A Trace of Austronesian Languages in the Archipelago). SAWERIGADING, 20(2), 227-238.

Fatinah, S. (2017). Kekerabatan Bahasa Kulawi dan Bahasa Kaili di Sulawesi Tengah. Kandai, 13(2), 249-262.

Hendrokumoro & Temaja, I G. B. W. B. (2019). The Genetic Relationship Between Ma’anyan and Malagasy. Metalingua, 18(2), 113–124.

Hilmi, M. (2017). Leksikostatistik Bahasa (Sasambo) Bahasa Sasak, Bahasa Sumbawa/Samawa, Dan Bahasa Bima/Mbojo: Kajian Linguistik Historis Komparatif. FONDATIA, 1(1), 165-176.

Idris, A. M. S., Adliah, A., & Alfina, S. (2020). Multilingual Interaction in Classroom Context. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 6(2), 381-393.

Keraf, G. (1991). Linguistik Bandingan Historis. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Mahsun, M. S. (1995). Dialektologi Diakronis: Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Mayangsari, D. (2020). Leksikostatistik Bahasa Bugis dan Bahasa Toraja (Lexicostatistic of Bugis Language and Toraja Language). JALABAHASA, 16(1), 83-96.

SRI, S. Y., Machmoed, H. A., & Arafah, B. (2021). Grice’s Cooperative Principle on Saturday Night Live Talk Show. JURNAL ILMU BUDAYA, 9(2), 155-160.

Sudaryanto, M. L. B. K. (1988). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Pengumpulan Data. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Yulianti, S., Arafah, B., Rofikah, U., Idris, A. M. S., Samsur, N., & Arafah, A. N. B. (2022). Conversational Implicatures on Saturday Night Live Talk Show. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(1), 189-197.