The Influence of University Image on Students' Decisions to Choose Muhammadiyah University of Pontianak

Main Article Content

Rosalina Rosalina
Samsuddin Samsuddin

Abstract

Higher education plays a strategic role in shaping individual competitiveness and national development. In an increasingly competitive educational environment, a university’s image becomes a crucial factor influencing students’ decisions when choosing a higher education institution. Muhammadiyah University of Pontianak, as a private university with strong accreditation and achievements, faces ongoing competition that requires maintaining and strengthening a positive institutional image. This study employed a causal associative quantitative approach to examine the influence of university image on students’ decisions. The population consisted of all active students of Muhammadiyah University of Pontianak from the 2021–2023 cohorts, with a total population of 4,346 students. Samples were selected using Proportionate Stratified Random Sampling and determined through the Slovin formula. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using validity and reliability tests, simple linear regression, correlation coefficient, and coefficient of determination (R²). The findings show that all research instruments were valid and reliable. Simple linear regression analysis indicated a positive and significant effect of university image on student decision-making, supported by a significance value below 0.05. The correlation coefficient of 0.768 demonstrated a strong relationship, while the R² value of 0.590 indicated that university image explained 59% of the variation in student decisions. The study concludes that university image has a strong, positive, and significant influence on students’ decisions to choose Muhammadiyah University of Pontianak, highlighting the importance of institutional image in higher education competitiveness.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rosalina, R., & Samsuddin, S. (2025). The Influence of University Image on Students’ Decisions to Choose Muhammadiyah University of Pontianak. Journal Educational Verkenning, 6(4), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.48173/jev.v6i4.364
Section
Articles

References

Adelman, C., Ewell, P., Gaston, P., & Schneider, C. G. (2014). The Degree Qualifications Profile: A Learning-Centered Framework for What College Graduates Should Know and Be Able to Do to Earn the Associate, Bachelor's or Master's Degree. Lumina Foundation for Education.

Altbach, P. G. (2007). Doctoral education: Present realities and future trends. In International handbook of higher education (pp. 65-81). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_5

Arifin, A. S. (2023). Human capital investment: Meningkatkan daya saing global melalui investasi pendidikan. Jurnal Education and Development, 11(2), 174-179. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v11i2.4672

Attahakul, P. (2025). Education’s Role in Creating a Sustainable and Equitable Society. Journal of Asian Language Teaching and Learning (Online), 6(1), 81-93.

Baum, S., Kurose, C., & McPherson, M. (2013). An overview of American higher education. The future of children, 17-39.

Dill, D. D. (2001). The regulation of public research universities: Changes in academic competition and implications for university autonomy and accountability. Higher Education Policy, 14(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(00)00027-1

Helda, H. (2022). National standards of education in contents standards and education process standards in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 1(3), 257-269.

Hemsley-Brown, J., Melewar, T. C., Nguyen, B., & Wilson, E. J. (2016). Exploring brand identity, meaning, image, and reputation (BIMIR) in higher education: A special section. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3019-3022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.016

Hidayat, M. T., Suryadi, S., Latifannisa, N., Sari, S. N., & Rino, R. (2025). Evolution of The Education Curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 6(2), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v6i2.1312

Joseph, M., Yakhou, M., & Stone, G. (2005). An educational institution's quest for service quality: customers’ perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(1), 66-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880510578669

Kosim, M., Muqoddam, F., Mubarok, F., & Laila, N. Q. (2023). The dynamics of Islamic education policies in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2172930. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172930

Masserini, L., Bini, M., & Pratesi, M. (2019). Do quality of services and institutional image impact students’ satisfaction and loyalty in higher education?. Social Indicators Research, 146(1), 91-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1927-y

Maulida, N. N., Ikhsan, M., & Yasin, M. (2024). Hubungan Pendidikan dan Ekonomi dalam Investasi. SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 3(3), 304-313. https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v3i3.3854

Moogan, Y. J., Baron, S., & Harris, K. (1999). Decision‐making behaviour of potential higher education students. Higher education quarterly, 53(3), 211-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2273.00127

Shavkidinova, D., Suyunova, F., & Kholdarova, J. (2023). Education is an important factor in human and country development. Current research journal of pedagogics, 4(01), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-04-01-04

Sukmayadi, V., & Yahya, A. (2020). Indonesian education landscape and the 21st century challenges. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(4), 219-234.

Wong, J. W. Y., Tong, C., & Wong, A. (2014). The mediating effects of school reputation and school image on the relationship between quality of teaching staff and student satisfaction in higher education in Hong Kong. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 4(11), 1557-1582.